
The values of human dignity, freedom, democracy, equality, rule of law, and respect for human rights - including those of minorities - are the foundation of European society. They also underpin the EU’s unique cultural model, which has long supported creativity and diversity in an evolving audiovisual sector. But in 2025, these values are under pressure from both inside and outside the Union.
If Europe does not act, its cultural model risks being hollowed out. The European Parliament must stand firm as the guardian of EU principles, ensuring that the Commission and Council stay true to their mandate. This means defending authors’ rights, cultural diversity, and artistic freedom - particularly in the face of disruptive technologies like artificial intelligence.
Europe’s audiovisual authors are united in calling for your support. The European Parliament has long been the strongest ally of artists. In this moment of unprecedented pressure, it must raise its voice louder than ever - to defend creativity, diversity, and the democratic values at the heart of the Europe.
Culture is not a bargaining chip - it is Europe’s creative DNA. Yet it is being eroded by both vague EU policy and aggressive corporate tactics. The Commission’s proposed AgoraEU programme (2028–2034) leaves budget allocations for audiovisual support dangerously undefined, handing the Commission unchecked discretion. Meanwhile, Netflix’s lawsuit against Belgium over the Audiovisual Media Services Directive (AVMSD) is a clear attempt to intimidate Member States into backing down from cultural investment requirements.
Audiovisual authors have always embraced innovation, but they cannot survive if their works are exploited without consent and payment. Today, AI companies scrape creative works to train their models, without consent or compensation. The result? A cycle of cultural impoverishment, collapsing incomes, and a flood of synthetic content that undermines human creativity. The Commission’s weak AI Act implementation package fails to impose meaningful obligations on developers. A blanket copyright exception under text and data mining undermines the Berne Convention, strips authors of negotiation power, and legitimises what is essentially cultural theft.
Unlike music authors, audiovisual authors rarely receive royalties when their works are broadcast or streamed. This inequity persists despite Directive 2019/790, which enshrines the principle of appropriate and proportionate remuneration (Article 18). Too often, contractual “freedom” is used to bypass this right.
Artistic freedom is not a luxury - it is the lifeblood of democracy. Yet across the EU, censorship, political interference, and attacks on cultural works are becoming normalised. Authors, funders, and public broadcasters increasingly self-censor out of fear for their livelihoods.